For the documentary our primary
aim was to document and show an insight into the street art scene in Liverpool.
The main inspiration for the documentary was Exit Through the Gift Shop (Banksy
2010) and I personally got some inspiration from some more amateur street art
documentaries namely Urbanbugs (Ersoy 2010) and Getting Up (2000).
Due to the nature of what we’re
showing I think we tried to make the documentary appeal to a younger audience around
15-25 since most of the people we talked to mentioned that it is generally a
young person’s domain. If we’re showing a doc about something that is mainly
done by young adults it makes sense to make the film appeal to them most. However
most of the interviewees we talked to were around 30-40 so there is interest
from older adults, also seen in the films I watched, so it too could appeal to
that kind of demographic but we didn't purely aim for it.
As for the drama we wanted to try
and make a fairly different and quite ambitious film, where we could have a
large fight scene that could be a lot of fun at the same time. We wanted it to
have twinges of comic book and video game influences to it. Since we were
inspired by films like Kick-Ass (Vaughn 2010) Super (Gunn 2010) and Sucker Punch
(Snyder 2011) our target audience is quite similar to theirs, that of teenagers
and young adults.
This is because the fight scenes
would be very engaging and fun for people of that age range to watch, and there
isn’t so much overt character development or story, it is subtly shown without
much dialogue. I think for the film to be the majority a fight scene would
appeal to your people much more than adults. Furthermore since it is meant to
be quite a fun piece and as I said based on the idea of comic and video game
fights we aimed to make it appeal to people that are into that kind of
entertainment.
The first thing to say about our documentary
is that it had a much different tone to what we imagined it having; it feels a
bit too corporate and not ‘urban’ enough. This is due to how we shot a lot of
everything, we used tripods etc a bit too much I think and the bits that did
fit that style there weren't enough of to bulk out the whole five mins. I don’t
think this takes too much away from the story though, it still is visually
pleasant and we succeeded our aim well I think. Also looking back the Liverpool
street art scene side we were showing wasn't that gritty anyway, so the style
of the film we ended up with probably more accurately represents what the scene
is actually like.
The second problem is that we didn't
have a story we were trying to get across, we simply wanted to document it as a
whole. Resultantly the interviews fit together, but not as seamlessly as I’d
hoped, it took a very long time to get a sequence that worked, and I think we
can get away with it but it would've been better had we had more of a focus on
what we wanted to get from the interviews.
I think our drama is very much
what we were looking to make when we first began discussing the idea and
throwing ideas around. It’s different, to show a fight of this complexity is
something no one else has done. I also think the style and influences are quite
clear too, visually some of the shots look quite similar to the fight sequences
I watched and analysed and it plays out in a fairly similar way. I also think
the film is fun enough to fit what we were going for, the fight is fittingly
energetic and the brief moments of comedy I think integrated well.
The five minute time restraint
also means that occasional moments in the film are a bit quicker than we would
have liked and we maybe should have planned out and been more rigorous in
shooting for the five min length rather than having to cut bits out resulting
in this problem.
My only concern is that the ‘journey’
in the film as necessary to the brief isn't extremely clear, it’s a mental journey
towards learning a lesson for Lucy, but I'm not sure if it’s not obvious enough.
Though being editor I was involved
with the documentary from start to finish, during the shoot I was assisting
everyone and me and Oli actually formed a second unit to make sure we had
enough footage. But obviously my main role came into play in post production. Noah
and I are the ones that crafted the main story out of all the interviews, with
all the other team pitching in and giving their input. I think the film had
more of a corporate feel to what everyone expected but that was due to the
footage we got and where and what we shot didn't have the ‘urban’ feel to it,
so would have been out of place to give it that feeling. I think it looks
fairly similar to how I imagined it would too, if anything I wish I had tried
to come up with better ways to bridge between interviews visually, but I think
for such a short film we got away with basic visual bridges, but it’s something
I’d change given the chance now.
I didn't come across to many
issues personally as editor beyond basic editing problems and all of them I
managed to overcome, most of which are problems I planned ahead for anyway by
backing up on multiple computers etc.
Again as camera I was still a big
part of the planning process and how best to show what we wanted and I often
pitched different ideas to consider experimenting with on set. The shoot its
self went very smoothly and we made sure we got everything we needed. We encountered
a few problems such as people using the location we were shooting in, camera
battery issues and changes in weather but we got around them as best we could and
got a lot of good footage from the days we had shooting, enough to not need to
go back. Visually it did play out how I imagined it would when planning, I
think this is partly thanks to our influences and amount of pre production
planning and storyboarding.
I often went into the edit suite
to check on how the edit was going when we’d finished shooting and if I was
needed to help in post production in any way, shape or form. I never was and
they were always on top of everything due to the good communication, planning
and time management of the editors, director and producer.
I put my name in to be editor
because of my lack of experience in that role and having an interest in it. As
a result of dropping myself in at the deep end I feel I am a lot better at all
aspects of the editing process now. I've improved at it technically at adapting
all the clips and panning photos etc and creatively by coming up with ways to
keep the frame busy and not dwelling on one image for too long, yet not making
the cuts too erratic and still allowing people time to see what we’re showing. A
lot of problems I’d never encountered I managed to get over myself which was
confidence boosting.
Furthermore since this is the
first big shoot I've ever done I felt like my time management skills improved greatly,
since we knew how much time we had to get certain things and we all worked
together to problem solve and make sure we got it all. This also came through
in the edit since I had to work to a deadline so had to manage everything very
well to get it all ready for the submission date.
It’s a similar story for drama I
nominated myself for camera because I needed something to force me to have
experience with the equipment, something the drama project definitely did. Not
only did I get to grips with how to use three different DSLR’s to a fairly
comfortable level but I also greatly improved my technical ability to change
lenses and set up the camera onto either a shoulder rig/dolly very quickly, a
very important and helpful skill to have on set.
Also as I mentioned I learnt how
to use lenses and taught myself the pros and cons of each, something I’d never experimented
with before and now that I know about them I feel I have a lot more creative ability
to show what I want to in the best way possible.
This project also gave me the
opportunity to work with proper actors for the first time, so I feel like I've
learnt quite a few inter-personal skills about how to interact with actors so
that everyone on set can be happy and comfortable on set to get the best
performance and footage out of the shoot.
Our documentary group worked extremely
well as a group I would say, from our first meeting we all gelled. We had
meetings nearly every day up until going to Liverpool so we all stayed in
contact to know how each idea was going, everyone was constantly involved
throughout the whole production too. Just because people’s jobs were mainly done
in Liverpool they still stayed involved and helped in post production and vice
versa, the post production people threw themselves in during the shooting and
everyone equally helped out in planning and pre production.
I think the only weakness we came
across was occasionally in meeting we could get side tracked and go off point
for quite a while. We could have spent that time refining ideas and coming up
with specifics for the shoot more, since one of the things we did was leave
quite bit to chance once we got there and hoped to find enough to shoot. It
worked out in the end but in hindsight was a risky strategy and is the only
thing I’d consider us needing to improve if we were to work together again.
My drama group too got on very
well eventually, it took slightly longer for us all to feel comfortable around
each other and express our opinions. This is due to being from different groups
and not really knowing each other to start with, a benefit we had with the
documentary. However it didn't take long for us all to get used to each other
and feel more comfortable. We again were constantly communicating with one another
via Facebook, with people constantly posting ideas on the wall and everyone
giving feedback. I personally think we could have had more meetings in person
but I think that is just a personal preference and in hindsight I don’t think
would have changed a great deal about the film anyway.
I think in this, since everyone
felt a bit more confident with doing a drama since it’s a more common form of
film to make, that there was more of a focus on just focussing on your
individual role. This isn't saying that people weren't willing to help one
another though, on set everyone was checking on everyone else to see it was
going OK and there was constant support and everyone was willing to help
throughout the whole process again.